Phone comparison · UK prices · October 2026
The Honor 600 leads on battery life, the screen and the camera. The Galaxy A57 is thinner. We have no current UK price for the Galaxy A57.
Comparing 2 phones
Honor 600Overall score 79/100
Galaxy A57Overall score 77/100
The Honor 600 has the bigger battery (6,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh on the Samsung), which may help it last longer between charges.
It also charges faster by cable (80 W vs 45 W on the Samsung), so it tops up quicker with a compatible charger.
The Honor 600 has the brighter screen (8,000 nits vs 1,900 nits on the Samsung), so it is easier to read in strong sunlight.
It also has the sharper screen (458 ppi vs 385 ppi on the Samsung), so text and photos look crisper.
The Honor 600's main camera has more megapixels (200 MP vs 50 MP on the Samsung), so photos can capture more fine detail in good light.
Its selfie camera also has more megapixels (50 MP vs 12 MP on the Samsung), so selfies and video calls can look more detailed.
Both have similar benchmark results, close enough not to matter much day to day.
The Honor 600 has the better water and dust rating (IP69K vs IP68 on the Samsung), so on top of surviving a dunk it is also rated against high-pressure water jets.
The Galaxy A57's screen uses named toughened glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+); the Honor's specs name none.
The Galaxy A57 is thinner (6.9 mm vs 7.8 mm on the Honor), so it feels slimmer in the hand.
One quick question, one tap each.
| Score | Honor 600 | Galaxy A57 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 81 | 62 |
| Screen | 90 | 82 |
| Camera | 75 | 73 |
| Speed | 70 | 72 |
| Toughness | 73 | 89 |
| Connections and extras | 85 | 83 |
| Overall | 79 | 77 |
How these scores are made: Each score is calculated from the maker's published specs and benchmark results, using one fixed formula for every phone. We have not tested these phones in the hand. How we score phones