Phone comparison · UK prices · October 2026
The Honor 600 Pro leads on battery life, the camera and speed. The Honor 600 doesn't pull clearly ahead on anything we compare. The Honor 600 Pro costs £300 more than the 600.
Comparing 2 phones
Honor 600Overall score 79/100
Honor 600 ProOverall score 87/100
The Honor 600 Pro costs £300 more than the 600.
You get: wireless charging, a zoom lens, a faster chip and more memory (RAM).
You give up: nothing in the specs we compare.
Worth it if you want wireless charging and a zoom lens. Keep the money if those extras don’t matter to you.
The Honor 600 Pro is the only one that charges without a cable (50 W), so it can top up on a wireless pad.
The Honor 600 Pro is the only one with a zoom lens (3.5x), so it can get closer to faraway subjects without cropping the photo.
The Honor 600 Pro's chip (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) scores higher in benchmark tests than the one in the 600 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4), so it should feel quicker in demanding apps and games.
It also has more memory (12GB vs 8GB on the 600), which helps it keep more apps open at once.
Both have similar weights (185 g and 195 g), close enough not to matter much day to day.
One quick question, one tap each.
| Score | Honor 600 | Honor 600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 81 | 98 |
| Screen | 90 | 90 |
| Camera | 75 | 85 |
| Speed | 70 | 90 |
| Toughness | 73 | 73 |
| Connections and extras | 85 | 87 |
| Overall | 79 | 87 |
How these scores are made: Each score is calculated from the maker's published specs and benchmark results, using one fixed formula for every phone. We have not tested these phones in the hand. How we score phones