Phone comparison · UK prices · October 2026
The iPhone 16 leads on battery life and speed. The iPhone 15 doesn't pull clearly ahead on anything we compare. The iPhone 16 costs £100 more than the iPhone 15.
Comparing 2 phones
The iPhone 16 costs £100 more than the iPhone 15.
You get: longer battery life in published tests, faster charging by cable, faster wireless charging and a faster chip.
You give up: nothing in the specs we compare.
Worth it if you want longer battery life in published tests and faster charging by cable. Keep the money if those extras don’t matter to you.
The iPhone 16 lasted longer in published battery tests (web browsing: 16 h 48 min vs 13 h 25 min on the iPhone 15), so it should go longer between charges.
It also charges faster by cable (25 W vs 15 W on the iPhone 15), so it tops up quicker with a compatible charger.
Both have similar sharpness (460 ppi and 461 ppi), close enough not to matter much day to day.
The iPhone 16's chip (Apple A18) scores higher in benchmark tests than the one in the iPhone 15 (Apple A16 Bionic), so it should feel quicker in demanding apps and games.
It also has more memory (8GB vs 6GB on the iPhone 15), which helps it keep more apps open at once.
Both have similar weights (170 g and 171 g), close enough not to matter much day to day.
One quick question, one tap each.
| Score | iPhone 16 | iPhone 15 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 55 | 50 |
| Screen | 77 | 77 |
| Camera | 80 | 79 |
| Speed | 87 | 82 |
| Toughness | 92 | 92 |
| Connections and extras | 87 | 80 |
| Overall | 80 | 77 |
How these scores are made: Each score is calculated from the maker's published specs and benchmark results, using one fixed formula for every phone. We have not tested these phones in the hand. How we score phones