Phone comparison · UK prices · October 2026
The iPhone 17e leads on speed and is thinner. The Pixel 10a leads on the screen and the camera, and has the bigger screen. The iPhone 17e costs £300 more than the Pixel.
Comparing 2 phones
iPhone 17eOverall score 77/100
Overall score 78/100
The iPhone 17e costs £300 more than the Pixel.
You get: faster wireless charging, a faster chip and a thinner body.
You give up: a bigger battery, faster charging by cable, a brighter screen and an ultra-wide camera.
Worth it if you want faster wireless charging and a faster chip. Keep the money if a bigger battery matters more to you.
The Pixel 10a has the bigger battery (5,100 mAh vs 4,005 mAh on the iPhone), which may help it last longer between charges.
The iPhone 17e charges faster without a cable (15 W vs 10 W on the Pixel), so cable-free top-ups are quicker.
The Pixel 10a has the brighter screen (3,000 nits vs 1,200 nits on the iPhone), so it is easier to read in strong sunlight.
The Pixel 10a is the only one with an ultra-wide camera, so it fits more into group shots and landscapes.
The iPhone 17e's chip (Apple A19) scores higher in benchmark tests than the one in the Pixel (Google Tensor G4), so it should feel quicker in demanding apps and games.
The Pixel 10a has the bigger screen (6.3 inches vs 6.1 inches on the iPhone), which gives more room for videos, maps and reading.
The iPhone 17e is thinner (7.8 mm vs 9 mm on the Pixel), so it feels slimmer in the hand.
Up to 3 quick questions, one tap each.
| Score | iPhone 17e | Pixel 10a |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 57 | 65 |
| Screen | 71 | 84 |
| Camera | 68 | 73 |
| Speed | 91 | 72 |
| Toughness | 95 | 85 |
| Connections and extras | 77 | 91 |
| Overall | 77 | 78 |
How these scores are made: Each score is calculated from the maker's published specs and benchmark results, using one fixed formula for every phone. We have not tested these phones in the hand. How we score phones