Phone comparison · UK prices · October 2026
The iPhone 17 Pro Max has a sharper selfie camera. The Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on battery life and is thinner. The iPhone 17 Pro Max costs £200 more than the Samsung.
Comparing 2 phones
iPhone 17 Pro MaxOverall score 90/100
Galaxy S26 UltraOverall score 92/100
The iPhone 17 Pro Max costs £200 more than the Samsung.
You get: a sharper selfie camera.
You give up: faster charging by cable, a longer zoom, a higher-resolution main camera and a thinner body.
Worth it if you want a sharper selfie camera. Keep the money if faster charging by cable matters more to you.
The Galaxy S26 Ultra charges faster by cable (60 W vs 25 W on the iPhone), so it tops up quicker with a compatible charger.
Both have similar peak brightness (3,000 nits and 2,600 nits) and similar sharpness (460 ppi and 500 ppi), close enough not to matter much day to day.
The Galaxy S26 Ultra's zoom lens reaches further (5x vs 4x on the iPhone), for closer shots of faraway subjects.
The iPhone 17 Pro Max's selfie camera has more megapixels (18 MP vs 12 MP on the Samsung), so selfies and video calls can look more detailed.
Both have similar benchmark results, close enough not to matter much day to day.
The Galaxy S26 Ultra is thinner (7.9 mm vs 8.8 mm on the iPhone), so it feels slimmer in the hand.
Up to 3 quick questions, one tap each.
| Score | iPhone 17 Pro Max | Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 70 | 78 |
| Screen | 91 | 91 |
| Camera | 93 | 97 |
| Speed | 92 | 94 |
| Toughness | 95 | 95 |
| Connections and extras | 98 | 95 |
| Overall | 90 | 92 |
How these scores are made: Each score is calculated from the maker's published specs and benchmark results, using one fixed formula for every phone. We have not tested these phones in the hand. How we score phones